James Morton, Jonathan Skinner, Alan Dowdall

February 2, 2025

Clearing the Air on A4 Emissions: A Guide for Timber Construction

When assessing the carbon footprint of building projects, emissions from transporting materials from factories to construction sites are often overlooked as they are perceived to be relatively insignificant. Module A4 in a lifecycle assessment measures these shipping emissions and for materials with low production emissions, transport can represent a substantial share of upfront carbon — especially for cross-laminated timber (CLT) that often travels long distances.

The A4 lifecycle assessment module measures emissions related to transport of construction materials

For materials with high production emissions (A1-A3), decarbonisation efforts are likely to target these phases, making A4 transport emissions increasingly significant due to limited decarbonisation options in large-scale transport.

Percentage of A1-A4 modules associated with each material
Figure 1: Percentage of A1-A4 modules associated with timber, steel and concrete

This article is not just about why A4 matters; it is a practical tool for making smarter early-stage choices based on accurate data. Using CLT as an example, project-specific assessments allow us to refine A4 estimates to reflect the true carbon impact.

Current Assessment Methods

There are two methods we can use to understand and assess the carbon emissions associated with transport which are briefly described below.

Energy Based

This calculates average emissions for a fleet and an average A4 emission per material delivered, using fuel consumption and government-issued emissions. However, tracking fuel use in material transport is challenging.

Activity Based

This widely used, simpler method, adopted by the Institute of Structural Engineers (IStructE) and Timber Development UK (TDUK), estimates a trip's carbon footprint based on distance and average vehicle emissions.

Energy and activity based carbon assessment methods
Figure 2: Energy based and activity based transport emissions assessments
What figures are we using for CLT?

To understand the journey and related environmental impact of CLT, we need to look beyond the sawmill. The IStructE's Structural Carbon Tool gives us an insight into the travel-related carbon cost; it calculates an emission value of 0.161 kgCO2e for each kilogram of timber product carried over 1500 kilometres.

TDUK recently published their “2024 Embodied Carbon Data for Timber Products” that highlighted the emission factors for importing CLT. This value, originally published in kgCO2e/m3 but converted using 480kg/m3 for CLT, has a value of 0.173 kgCO2e/kg. This accounts for both sea and road travel from Europe, including a 20% addition to the figure to account for unladen lorry journeys once the CLT has been delivered at the port.

To understand the journey and related environmental impact of CLT, we need to look beyond the sawmill. The IStructE's Structural Carbon Tool gives us an insight into the travel-related carbon cost; it calculates an emission value of 0.161 kgCO2e for each kilogram of timber product carried over 1500 kilometres.

TDUK recently published their “2024 Embodied Carbon Data for Timber Products” that highlighted the emission factors for importing CLT. This value, originally published in kgCO2e/m3 but converted using 480kg/m3 for CLT, has a value of 0.173 kgCO2e/kg. This accounts for both sea and road travel from Europe, including a 20% addition to the figure to account for unladen lorry journeys once the CLT has been delivered at the port.

Our Research

To better understand the specifics in CLT transport, we engaged with the industry and collected data on many of the factors that impact on the A4 emissions.

Understanding the supply chain
Figure 3: Understanding the industry
How does timber travel?

Using CLT transport to UK from mainland Europe as an example, most CLT is carried by articulated lorries (>33 tonnes), though the lorry's load capacity often exceeds the volume of timber carried, resulting in an average 76% load.

Timber transport involves road and sea routes. Most CLT reaches the Port of Rotterdam by road, then roll-on roll-off ferries transport it to a UK port for final delivery to construction sites.

Our research on typical transport modes, vehicle load, and distances has led to a recommended carbon factor of 0.119 kgCO2e/kg — 26% lower than the IStructE standard by accounting for actual load levels.

Although these figures are related to UK timber use, the concepts remain the same for mainland Europe, with the use of articulated lorries and roll-on roll-off ferries to reach its desired destination.

CLT and glulam production sites
Figure 4: CLT and glulam production sites

To get an accurate freighting profile, it can be broken down as follows:

For road trips:

  • Articulated lorries (capacity for more than 33 tonnes) journey around 1100 km from the timber mill to the European port.
  • The last leg from UK ports to construction sites is a shorter 200 km sprint.
  • Lorries, on returning, travel lighter by around 50 km to the next commission.

For sea voyages:

  • Roll-on roll-off ferries cover about 350 kilometres between European and UK ports.
Conclusion

When assessing total emissions for materials from production to on-site delivery (A1-A5), it is essential to look beyond production (A1-A3) for a complete view, particularly in early design stages.

Using this research for cross-laminated timber, the IStructE carbon calculator's standard delivery stage (A4) emissions can be lowered by 26%, resulting in a 10% reduction in combined A1-A5 emissions. As the construction industry works to cut production emissions (via low-emission steel, carbon capture, cement alternatives etc.), accurately measuring transport emissions will be vital for full embodied carbon assessments. This calls for greater data collection and knowledge sharing across the supply chain to better understand carbon sources.

A4 emission for CLT
Figure 5: A4 emissions for CLT. The figures presented by Ramboll and the IStructE do not include well-to-tank emissions—the emissions arising from the production, transportation, and distribution of fuel. In contrast, TDUK incorporate well-to-tank emissions in their assessment, which accounts for a proportion of the higher figure. When factoring well-to-tank emissions into the Ramboll estimate, there remains a significant reduction in the emissions associated with transporting timber compared to current practices.

The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions from B&K Structures, Hybrid Structures, KLH UK and StoraEnso without which this article would not be possible.

Want to know more?

  • James Morton

    Design Engineer

    +44 7814 066536

    James Morton
  • Jonathan Skinner

    Associate

    +44 7870 810807

    Jonathan Skinner
  • Alan Dowdall

    Director

    +44 7870 809244

    Alan Dowdall

Fea­tured In­sights

View all

Fea­tured In­sights

Which life cycle assessment?

A recent study compares commonly used building life cycle assessment methodologies in Europe. Our experts created a database of building carbon footprints to demystify LCA variations and help you break down the differences.

COP26 was a much-needed reminder of the urgency of reducing carbon — by thinking differently we believe it's possible to remove as much as 1 million tonnes of CO2e from the UK building sector annually.

High-rise buildings under construction in San Francisco
How to save 1 million tonnes of CO2