6 tips on de-risking carbon capture project development at your cement plant

Based on our experience from more than 100 successfully completed assignments within carbon capture, we have gathered six tips on de-risking carbon capture project development at your cement plant.

Be proactive in assessing the core carbon capture technology

The choice and assessment of the core capture technology plays a central role in the successful deployment of carbon capture projects. As innovative emerging technologies enter the market, their implementation involves intricate technological, economic, and environmental complexities that must be assessed and compared with thoroughly tested technologies.

An early-stage proactive approach in assessing your core carbon capture technology can help you:

Optimise energy usage when integrating carbon capture technologies

The integration of carbon capture technologies within the energy infrastructure of your cement plant can lead to a diversified and more resilient energy portfolio. This diversification can act as a buffer against energy price fluctuations and supply disruptions, reducing the exposure of the project to energy-related risks. Additionally, by staying ahead of increasingly stringent environmental regulations and emissions standards, the project becomes less susceptible to regulatory hurdles and compliance-related issues.

Energy optimisation includes assessment of waste heat recovery such as district heat through heat pumps, and reduction of energy usage in the capture process itself. Determining the most financially attractive heat recovery and energy integration solution depends on the specific technical configuration of each cement plant, and financial drivers like future projected cost of energy, cost of capital, and requirements for the return on investment. Also, consider a project specific assessment of utilities, including access to sewer/raw water, electricity infrastructure, and access to a district heating network.

Overall, energy optimisation and integration can help you:

Be aware of the environmental constraints and plan carefully

While carbon capture plants follow a typical planning and permitting pathway, there are certain elements that are particular to this technology. Concentrated CO₂ is new for most cement plants, and it is important to understand the process and health related risks. For instance, documenting the best and safest physical intermediate on-site storage of liquified pressurized CO₂ may require dedicated risk assessments, or even a computational fluid dynamic modelling of worst-case scenario to determine if mitigations are needed or to document the risks to authorities and internal stakeholders.

Additionally, air-borne pollutants will be impacted partly due to a smaller volume flow of flue gas once CO₂ is removed (therefore affecting flue gas dispersion), and partly due to the risk of new pollutants that must be managed, for example degradation products of amines, like nitrosamines, which may be a focus point for the environmental authorities.

Air dispersion modelling is helpful at an early stage in the project to determine if re-use of existing stack(s) is viable, or alternatively clarify options and constraints for a new stack or point source of emission. Later in the project development it will be important to obtain clear direction from authorities relating to emission monitoring requirements and limits in the cleaned flue gas. Note that different countries may have different requirements.

Emission limit values of pollutants from cement plants may be strengthened in the future (like NOx and SOx), and the carbon capture flue gas integration must therefore consider possible requirements for future abatement technology.

Finally, the planning and permitting activities must take place prior to final investment decision to avoid the risk of additional environmental requirements (and cost overruns or delays) during project execution.

Consider solvent health management systems

Solvent health management systems are another essential component in carbon capture processes, particularly in cement plants where flue gas often contains impurities. By implementing additional steps to clean the flue gas before it enters the capture plant, the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the carbon capture system can potentially be improved. The removal of particulates, dust, and other contaminants not only enhances the performance of the solvent but also reduces potential damage and wear on the equipment, leading to improved operational reliability.

Maintain the business case and project implementation closely intertwined

Implementing carbon capture at cement plants relies on a robust business case. A carbon capture project is a capital-intensive infrastructure project, with revenue streams depending on external factors such as the future value of CO₂, the regulatory setting, investment cost, as well as the impact on existing operational costs and staffing. There are three major aspects that play a key role when developing the business case:

But a robust business case doesn’t stand alone, it needs a well-structured project development process that can bring the technical and operational aspects to life, including risk assessment, stakeholder engagement, implementation, and evaluation. A good project model:

Have a procurement strategy in place

Procurement plays an important role in de-risking carbon capture project development at cement plants. For some projects paid pre-engineering by market actors such as EPC or technology providers is required to commercially de-risk the project while keeping a competitive environment. For other projects it may be more suitable with a partnering approach, for instance if grant funding deadlines require fast-track project delivery.

The procurement strategy must also consider how many packages will the project consist of. For instance, are you able and willing to self-deliver in larger packages to cut costs, for example procure your own CO₂ storage tanks, balance of plant, jetty infrastructure, civil infrastructure or will your project financials require de-risking to a degree where a fixed price/turn-key contractor is needed, as well as a long-term operation and maintenance contract for operating the capture plant.